Friday, September 30, 2011

The Contagion experience- Crisis Comm reflection 4

I have the worst memory when it comes to movies. Seriously, I should have taken notes during Contagion. What I do know, is that I have washed my hands more since I have seen that movie than any other time my life. Yikes, germs have never been so terrifying.

From a crisis management perspective, this film was beyond interesting... it was overwhelming. The impact of an epidemic like one in the film was unimaginable. And as the plot went on and more people became infected, the crisis snow balled- making any crisis communication professional stutter in disbelief.

However, in the very initial phases, immediately following the death of Gweneth Paltrow’s character it seemed there were overt and thoughtful crisis management meetings. These brought to light complications based on the interests of the multiple agencies involved, but the largest complication was the unknown.

Early on, there was no knowledge of where the epidemic began, how exactly it was bring spread, and what could stop it. Instead, there were a few deaths that were loosely linked and no understanding of what could be the root of the disease. At this point, there was a lot to consider for the players at the table. They had choices to make- and each of these involved some amount of risk and a different group of stakeholders.

If the news were to go live that there was a possible epidemic looming then panic and frenzy could ensue. This could potentially be more dangerous than the germ. The professionals at the CDC devised a plan to try to separate infected persons from the healthy. A few schools were closed, offices, etc. People were encouraged to stay home if they were not feeling well.

Unfortunately, this was not enough. As time went on panic did set in. There were paracrises beginning as food the supply dwindled. Looting and violent crime increased as people’s desperation to survive increased.

What I found most interesting about the film was the downplay of the mass media involvement. Aside from a few seconds of footage, there was very little mention of the affect the mass media would have. There was one rogue blogger whose coverage of the outbreak and the cure became central to the plot, but CNN, CBS, Fox News, etc were all seemingly uninvolved. If this were a real event, I contend that the panic would have set in much sooner.

Seeing the frenzy over the limited supply of vaccines and forsythia brings back memories of recent gas shortages in Charlotte. Lines at the pump went on for blocks. People filled up their vehicles and spare tanks as well. Where did the sense of panic come from? The mass media.

I really enjoyed this film. It petrified me, but gave me a different perspective on handling crisis communication. Weighing overwhelming options and doing the best thing is not always easy. Likewise, it is not easy to prepare for a crisis of this nature. While contagious epidemics in general are worthy of plans, the unexpected characteristics of one type of epidemic can change the crisis management plan completely.

6 comments:

  1. I thought the lack of focus on the major media was really interesting. Other than a few shots of televisions, it's as if the filmakers deliberately excluded its presence. Why? Maybe the director just had too many stories. Maybe he wanted to make a statement about social media's increasingly importance. We don't know, but it definitely leaves out a major source of crisis communication influence, making the film slightly incomplete.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that the role of the media was extremely downplayed in this film. Any major crisis today would be played out through social media in a heartbeat. While I think it could have incited more panic in some ways, social networks could also have self organized to identify resources and even possibly identified the source of the virus more quickly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wow - I hadn't really thought about the lack of major media attention until I read your reflection. Interesting point! It's an interesting counter point to the social media role that Jude Law brought to the film.

    I also completely understand what you're saying about an overwhelming crisis. How in the world do we make decisions abut managing a situation when we're crippled with fear *and* when it's impossible to know where to start. Theory grounds us, but this (unfortunately) is one of those things that takes practice.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Going against the rest of the class, I saw the lack of attention to conventional media and the focus of blog as a negative portrayal of social media. While the CDC was cold and calculated in their responses, they went about it in a way to try and reduce panic. Admitting they had no idea on how to address the outbreak would have resulted in a complete breakdown of society. With the crazy tooth and neurotic tendencies of Jude Law's character the movie director painted an "any crazy person with internet and a blog" can convince people to do whatever they want.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wow Adrienne! What do you mean you don't remember the movie. No note taking needed. Great post. I didn't really consider the downplay of the media until you mentioned it. Now that you have. I agree. I don't think that one blogger would be commanding so much attention. In fact, I think the blogosphere would be overwhelmed with concerned people, a few whackos and a good number of people with credibility and a large following. If the crisis in "Contagion" ever actually occurs, the media will be a much larger stakeholder then what was portrayed in the film.

    ReplyDelete